Ohio voters on Tuesday resoundingly rejected a Republican-backed measure that would have made it more difficult to change the state’s constitution, setting up a fall campaign that will become the nation’s latest referendum on abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned nationwide protections last year.

  • FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 year ago

    From my city’s Democrat group:

    What landmark changes to Ohio law would have FAILED under Issue 1?

    In just the 21st century:

    • 2000: Clean Ohio Fund; state can sell enviro bonds (57% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 2005: Third Frontier program to modernize Ohio’s economy (54% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 2006: Increasing minimum wage (57% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 2009: Legalizing gambling at casinos in Cbus, CLE, Cincy, Toledo (53% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 2015: Barring businesses from using amendment process to form monopolies (51% in favor…would have FAILED)

    Let’s go further back now:

    • 1923: Remove the phrase “white male” from parts of the constitution describing VOTER ELIGIBILITY (56% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 1933: Giving counties authority to create city charters with “home rule” (53% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1933: Set the 10-mill property tax limit that local governments can impose without getting approval from voters (59.7% in favor…would have FAILED)
    • 1949: Ending the practice of straight-ticket voting; voters must mark their candidates, not just check off a party (57% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1953: Creation of Ohio state school board, which advises local school districts on education policy (57% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1953: Allowing People of Color to serve in the Ohio National Guard (57% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1961: Allowing Women to serve in Ohio National Guard (50.1% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1975: Allowing charitable orgs to run bingo games, a form of gambling (54% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1978: Prison labor reform (54% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1982: Enabled lower-interest, first-time home-buyer programs that continue today (57% in favor…would have failed)
    • 1990: Tax credits and other steps to help finance housing projects (53% in favor…would have failed)
    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      So basically everything good in the last century wouldve failed and this law would’ve ensured Ohio would slide into the same useless bucket as Alabama on the national scale

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what they’re trying now. Ohio is a major state, with multiple major cities, and a long history as a swing state due to being roughly even rural/urban. Like Columbus is really queer, Cleveland is just as Great Lakes as Toronto, Detroit, and Chicago, and we’ve also got Appalachia and a lot of what you probably can’t tell isn’t rural Indiana. Add in that Columbus is a major hub for business and it’s very valuable and perceived as takable.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man looking at some of these with the years next to them and Ohio used to be kinda based

      And yeah there are other things that may desperately need to be changed about our constitution that wouldn’t clear the 60% mark even beyond abortion. Namely our constitution currently prohibits recognition of gay marriage, which while no longer an issue in the Obergefell era, may become relevant again depending on who bribes the Supreme Court.

      They’re trying to force the big Cs to live at the whims of rural Ohioans despite how close the urban/rural population is