• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The event itself must have a lot carbon footprint.

    Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.

    • nal@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.

        I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition?

        Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.