• RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it. Companies want to make money. Study after study proves that WFH generates greater productivity on average and, therefore, more output and more money. Surely, it must be costing more to maintain massive office buildings and overpay useless middle managers to lord over employees?

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There have been further studies that show that work from home may not be as productive. The science doesn’t seem to be as settled.

      You also may have issues with coordination where some face time would be good on an as-needed basis. It may not need to be full time in the office, but I can see wanting some in person meetings.

    • eltimablo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They get huge tax breaks for the bodies those buildings were supposed to bring to their cities. Now that nobody’s in them, those cities aren’t getting the extra tax money from the office workers anymore, so they’re pressuring companies to bring workers back to the office. No giant, money-thirsty corporation wants to maintain a huge, expensive office building, but they’re stuck doing so unless they want to sell it at a loss and risk pissing off the owners of whatever palms they had to grease to get the deal in the first place.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s good for companies that rent office space, but not for companies that own those offices. This is corporate landlords throwing a shitfit, and they have a lot more money and own more news outlets than companies who rent.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re soooo close to understanding.

    Having people stay at this hotel eliminates the commute.

    Remote work eliminates the commute.

    Now, if the company would simply get with it, they could save money both by not having this asinine hotel idea and by not having all the office space.

  • skellener@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s over Google. Let people work wherever they want. If the work is getting done, there’s nothing to complain about.

  • Four_lights77@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey google, I heard people like money. Maybe if you pay willing employees a reasonable amount to commute, they’ll be willing to come in. Otherwise, shut it.