• susquatch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody please tell me if I understand this correctly? So the liberal government had a bill passed that disallows social media companies from sharing news articles, then Trudeau blasts the social media company for not sharing news articles.

    • reanmachine@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They passed a law that said big companies have to PAY to post links to articles.

      On the surface it was to go after places like Google News that would summarize an article, link to it for attribution, but people would rarely visit the original article fueling the advertisements that funded the media.

      However to nobody’s surprise, the government cocked up the legislation for the problem. They made a law that required the to pay for links, so the big companies just went… Ok, no links, no bill.

      Obviously they didn’t think this through, they wanted money to flow from Google/FB to Canadian media for a real problem, but in the effort to seek a way to tap the money for taxes, over legislated without understanding the problem and ended up with no links, no taxes.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the liberal government

      Which other government would it be? It’s okay to just say The Government when they’re the elected ones … unless this is less a question and more Question Period?

  • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jeez I’m not one to bash Trudeau but if he really thinks this outcome was inconceivable maybe the guy isn’t so bright after all.