• Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Oh no they were inconvenient and annoying, exactly as intended! It’s almost like they were protesting something!

    Meanwhile I’m wondering why ecoterrorism isn’t more popular. Not saying I support it (or saying I don’t), I am just surprised that there are less desperate people than I expected.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Apparently a common career for ex-soldiers and special forces is security for oil companies. So they’re clearly surprised too.

      Only a matter of time at this point, I suspect.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Go to the Middle East to liberate petrol, come back home to work for the same companies without a proxy!

    • Daxtron2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      My biggest concern with ecoterrorism is that a lot of things that should be destroyed, if not done so in a safe way, may end up having worse environmental impacts than if they were left alone.

      • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        i think eco terrorism will be mostly focused sabotage. all eco terrorist need to do is stop production of refined goods, supply line being global, sabotaging some unprotected factory in bangladesh that is the only one that produces a specific component could stop production of some given product globally.