• saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I only use my programming for good. For instance Bat_Count.exe lets the user enter a number and then the Count from sesame street will count to this number and say “Ah ah ah!” at the end.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not with that attitude. There is no reason we can’t cultivate alternatives like PeerTube. No video platform starts with a massive library and if we actually want to take back our digital rights then we have to put our foot down and give a hard “no” to trading those rights away just because we really want to watch a particular creator on a corporate platform. It’s the only way to not only stick it to Google but also let creators know that viewers will not tolerate the likes of Google.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think the hosting is the real problem. For something like Lemmy where it’s just text it’s not too expensive, but when you need to store and stream videos for free I have to imagine most people wouldn’t be able to afford that without charging for it and the moment you start charging you can’t compete with YouTube anymore

        • jackpot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          i think the solution could be a FOSS torrenting site where everyone hosts their own videos (or maybe a stream only site?). people are already willing to fork over for netflix so maybe if the content quality was extremely high theyd shift (e.g. nebula)

          • jcg@halubilo.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nebula could be a good case study in how well this would work. The content on there is of exceptional quality. To be honest, though, that’s not always what I’m looking for. Sometimes I just want a bunch of garbage rather than a little high quality content. The big social media platforms put a bunch of it in one place. I know it’s not really a good thing, but sometimes I just need background noise while I do other shit and random YouTube videos really does it for me.

            I can’t seem to find any data on how much of Nebula’s revenue is actually due to the Curiosity stream tie-in, but I know even I was wary of the $5/mo subscription without the CuriosityStream sub to sweeten the deal. So maybe even the world’s largest creator-owned streaming platform needed that investment.

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yep, this is already a solved problem via torrents. All that’s needed is a site (like lemmy or something else) to host the links, and help with content discovery.

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I assume they wrote it as 5000 and it got changed to 5E3 by the minifier as it saves a byte?

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah that’d be my guess. Minifiers squeeze every byte. true and false get minified to !0 and !1 respectively.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like we’re regressing back to the Netscape Navigator/Internet Explorer browser war days, when browsers were openly and intentionally breaking functionality on competing sites.

  • jeebus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t understand why people don’t pay for YouTube premium. Best streaming service I pay for. No ad blockers required. When I watch YouTube at someone else’s house the ads drive me nuts.

    • pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago
      • it’s too expensive to begin with. 14$/month ? Netflix is more expensive to run and is cheaper. I would be fine paying 5€/month tho.

      • at this point YouTube made a point I was not an acceptable client for them (5s delay because I’m not using the company mandated browser) so I’m not supporting that.

      You want my money Google? You already did. I bought a fucking pixel 8 pro because it’s a goddamn amazing phone. Do the same with YouTube.

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        100%. It’s the principle of the thing. I don’t care how good YouTube Red is, simply the fact that they pulled as much bullshit as they have in an attempt to sucker people into paying for it warrants a total and permanent boycott. What Google is doing is utterly unacceptable and I’m not going to reward them for abusing my digital rights.

        • Quik@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          because it’s insanely difficult to get along completely without YouTube. Or if you happen to have some kind of business it’s easier said than done to “just not optimize” for Google products or “just not use Google services” like having a Google Maps entry. On a side note, even getting a privacy focused smartphone without using Google services and products is near to impossible (e.g. GrapheneOS only works on Pixel phones…)

          • Kayn@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I am. It’s just ironic to say “fuck Google” while continuing to depend on Google’s service

              • Kayn@dormi.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                You people are arguing that YouTube should be hosting videos without asking for any compensation. You will continue blocking ads no matter how many of them there are.

                I hope YouTube just completely paywalls itself so this whining can end already.

                • griD@feddit.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Don’t cut yourself with that edge!

                  inb4: “But YT operates at a loss and needs monies”. No. Just no. They deliberately worked at a loss to stifle and kill opposition.

    • letsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      (a) because it’s too expensive, and (b) it didn’t take a lot of DDGing to find “why am I still getting ads with YT Premium” and it turns out there are a bunch of exceptions that the YTP page doesn’t tell you about.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been having an excellent experience with premium as well. I like knowing that I’m directly materially contributing to the people I watch. The only problem I have with YouTube premium lately is that it keeps trying to suggest fucking 8 hours long music streams to my TV and seems as though it’s REFUSING to learn that I don’t want to see that shit unless I’m deliberately searching for it. Get that shit the FUCK outta my feed. Otherwise, it’s the way YouTube was meant to be used.

      If I had my way though, I’d nuke YouTube’s ad system from orbit and replace it with this: for ads, NO VIDEO, NO SOUND, ONLY A SLIDE SHOW, CONTAINING ONLY TEXT. 15 Slides or 15 Seconds, MAXIMUM, whichever runs out first. If the user clicks anywhere but the product link, it advances the slide or closes the ad. PERIOD.