I’ll just edit instead!

  • root@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bed bugs.

    Positive outcome would be no more having to burn contaminted possessions (or wash them in very hot water many times).

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ticks and botflies. We don’t need maggots making a home in our skin. Even worse is what they do to animals like sheep.

    Mosquitos are mainly an annoyance to me and I can deal with them.

    • Devi@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maggots are the things that breakdown dead stuff, without them you’d have dead animals and plants rotting on the ground for ages while the bacteria breaks them down slowly. I think the whole world would smell worse.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        These are maggots that get laid in your skin specifically. Look up “bot flies”

        Fungi do most of the rotting anyway.

  • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cockroaches… as far as I’m aware, they don’t contribute anything to the eco system, they’re just pests.

    Unfortunatelly, not even a nuclear war can erradicate them 😒.

  • hanni@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know you said that we shouldn’t say humans but I’m gonna say it anyway:

    Humans.

    Sorry.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be interesting to tally up the negative impacts of removing humans as well.

      Culls of invasive species would no longer occur, which would be detrimental in those ecosystems.

      A fairly significant number of endangered animals probably only exist today due to human intervention and breeding programs (i am well aware that we probably made them endangered in the first place)

      Cross breeds would be done as well, Ligers and Mules require humans for breeding. Although in fairness they are definitely not natural to begin with.

      Many animals we have domesticated would be done for as well, most smaller dogs are completely, reliant on humans for food and grooming. Many cats would be okay, but some breeds are likely dead ends as well. Jersey cows would probably have a bad time as well, without milking, sheep might have issues as well?

      Interesting thought experiment.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good point! Within a few weeks billions of animals would die. Chicken, pigs, cows, cats and dogs.

        We definitely need to clarify what “good for the planet” means if we want to decide on the best answer.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Beavers. Just the mere sound of rushing water triggers their damn building instincts (scientists tested this). Just let the environment be itself.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you gave any random person god like powers to do whatever they wanted, they would immediately eradicate mosquitoes as their first act.