• scientist@eu.mastodon.green
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @sonori @silence7

    Yep, we must have energy to power the industrial complex. I mean, what would happen if we couldn’t keep the lights on at at weapons factories? Or, heaven forbid, all those Christmas lights and masses of other non-essential products and services?

    What will it take for people to take the effects of a degrading nature seriously? When there is another crazy war, it’s all folk can think about.

    It does make me question why so many “leaders” keep on making the same bad mistakes.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, while we could definitely be more efficient, you realize most of the energy we use in industry not oil related is for things like food, homes, clothes, transport, etc… Wepons are high cost, but ultimately not made at anything like the scale that most other industries operate at.

      House wise, nothing can compare to heating and air conditioning in terms of energy use. Heat pumps are very efficient, but they’ll still burn though far more energy than a electric car, much less things like stoves and driers. There are limits to how well you can insulate a home without health risks, and getting close to that still requires pumping in cold air and venting warm to carry out co2. To say nothing of having to also abandon a lot of warm areas becuse they’ve gotten to hot to be safe without heat pumps.

      If we are to replace fossil fuel in heating, and exterminating everyone in Canada, Mexico, and the Middle East is off the table, then we need to vastly expand our electricity production.