• alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Donald Trump sucks, but this title is some clickbait bullshit written by a buzzfeed-level journalist.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      BuzzFeed news is better than this. They break good news stories. Writers for the Economist tend to be experts at telling us things we already know, years later.

      This “man” (and I use that term loosely) was already elected president and served a 4 year term. Everyone who paid the slightest attention knows what he’s about.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the Republican Party in general. Specifically because they’ve largely suborned themselves to Trump’s insanity, because they think they can control him and cement themselves into power. If you remember last time, that didn’t work at all.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ask McCarthy how things work out when you welcome the crazies into the party and assume you can keep them in line.

      And yes, I’m fully aware that McCarthy was one of “the crazies” back when the tea party was considered the extreme part of the GOP.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Richard Pryor had a classic bit about a wino looking down on a junkie. It’s actually classic addict behavior for one user to find reasons they are better than their peers.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was more talking about the “controlling him” angle, because he was absolutely unmoored from reality on day 1 and never got any better.

  • Risk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t news. It’s an opinion piece. Could we have opinion pieces in a different community to news articles?

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh. Rise of fascism is a pretty big deal. Not really an opinion thing either that is factually what he is. The republican party released a document outlining how they plan to implement fascism in the US government.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The republican party released a document outlining how they plan to implement fascism in the US government.

        Even though I know what your talking about, I really think if your going to make bold statements like that, you should at least link to the document. I am sure a certain percentage of people rolled their eyes at that comment.

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Rise of fascism is a massive deal. Yes, arguably factual too that he is the current head of the fascist movement in the US.

        The Republican Party releasing a document outlining how they implement fascism in the US government is news.

        But the article is still not news - new information - per se. It’s an opinionated presentation of the news. I don’t disagree with the opinion, I’d just like to see a separation of communities for news and for current event discussion with a focus on articles like this, less so news articles.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not just him.

    In my eyes, the following individuals are dangers to the world and society:

    Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Ebrahim Raisi, Ron DeSantis, Mitch McConnell, John Thune, Susan Collins, Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Greg Abbott, Benjamin Netanyahu, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet, Mike Johnson

    And everybody else I hadn’t named but behave similarly to or exactly like these piles of collective shits. What a fucking time to be alive, said no one unironically. Damn I have to keep almost coming back to this comment to edit because of a name of some other asshole I just remembered to tack onto this list, it’s horrible.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also Graham, DeSantis, Hawley, Tuberville, Barr, Comey-Barret, Kavanaugh, and basically anyone involved with the national-level GOP leadership. They’re all psychopaths.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We live in what will be known as a historically interesting time down the line, if we make it down said line.

    • derphurr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      We do have at least a hypothetical check on people like Trump, it’s supposed to be the other party. Sadly the DNC is corrupt and pathetic.

      In 2016, Hillary and DNC signed an agreement so DNC would get a huge chunk of her campaign money, so they cheated and helped Hillary win the primary system. The exact same thing is happening again and the Biden campaign just signed a similar agreement a few months ago.

      The people to blame here when Trump wins again will be DNC idiots again.

      Certainly this country could find anyone with a pulse that isn’t 80 years and either senile or crazy.

    • hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ve done that for 70 or 80 years. Like the saying goes, “do what you love, and you’ll eventually become a global hegemon, weilding your influence like a club and keeping your boot on the neck of the majority of the planet, both economically and militarily.”

      Mom always said that.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Global warming and its not close. Especially if the trend over the last 6 months holds.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US government is a major factor in determining what gets done about global warming. If the USA gets locked into antidemocratic fascism and climate change denial it will exacerbate global warming everywhere. That’s what the Republicans promise.

  • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s not a dangerous man. He’s an old fat idiot. The dager is the braindead americans who support him.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’s an old fat idiot.

      Hitler was a buffoon too, but still very dangerous. Trump will go for dictatorship and promises vengeance against his perceived enemies. An idiot with unchecked power is dangerous.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s an old fat idiot.

      Yes, but he’s an idiot with a large group of cultlike followers. That’s what makes him dangerous.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the people in his administration that carry out his orders. But that’s the same all over the world and rarely are bad leaders ignored or overthrown.

  • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So what I don’t get is, does the US not have any mechsnism in place that would prevent this? Like could a party named “We will turn this country to literal fascis and we will kill several minority groups” just…run?

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We do. It’s called the constitution and whatever liberties we’ve installed.

      The problem is the toothless actions that have been taken, to enforce these things. Too much bargaining, bypassing and bribing.

      But if we give them a strongly worded letter or a warning or a caution - that’ll get things done! That’ll be like telling that child or pet not to do something even though you know they’ll do it anyways and once they do it, you go “aw schucks!” before fixing the issue and cycling back again.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that Trump presents such a threat to the world after four disasterous years as President, after attempting to tamper with the electoral college votes, voting machines, after publicly professing his admiration for criminals and despots, because of an elections and politicians that can be overtly bought because the Supreme Court, which itself has been corrupted by bribes and influence allows it to be, may just well bring down the Republic. We are at the point where wrapping oneself in the flag and spewing fascist screeds is considered patriotic, whereas preserving the Enlightenment principles on which the Republic was founded is considered dangerous and subversive. Even if Trump died today, another strongman, probably less stupid than Trump, would take his place, and likely succeed in destroying the Republic. The founders of this country could never have imagined the effects of hate-filled mass media on a population when their main means of information dissemination required imprinting and transporting paper.

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, it’s climate change, but sure Trump’s not good either.

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s the rub - drumft part deux will seal the deal on climate.

      Last chance. Act now to stop this fucker.

      He is backed (and controlled) by pootin.

      Pootin is using social media to target impressionable idiots.

      Said idiots raise the din of idiocy and drown out reason. Etc. Etc.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to believe that his election loss and absolute shitshow he turned it into with the insurrection and all has sealed his fate and he will never actually win half of America again. He’s a joke. A criminal. He fooled people once but some won’t get fooled again. SOME. All it takes is a small percentage of voters to just stay home and he’ll lose. He can’t win. He’s a loser. He can’t win.

    Then I look over at fucking Biden and it’s like… shit.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My brother in Christ, lots of people love him. Lots are morons.

      Most important election ever and it’s a rapist piece of shit vs a roomba.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know a lot of people love him. 30% of the country are his forever and that’s that. But those people aren’t enough to win on their own. He won because Republicans lined up to block Hilary.

        In fact, Hilary is the best example of what I think will go wrong for Trump. Hilary was a very strong candidate. But maybe 5% of Democrats just didn’t care to turn out for her: a mix of not liking her, being too progressive for her, maybe being sexist, and just presuming she would win.

        That little bit of slack did her in.

        Will Trump experience that “little bit of slack” in 2024 compared to 2016? I think he will. In 2016 he was a wild phenomenon, an outsider, a rock that lots of otherwise reasonable people decided it was time to throw at the system.

        He doesn’t have all that mystique this time. He’s not a disruptive new challenger from out of left field. He’s last year’s loser and a confirmed criminal. He will turn out his 30% base just fine. But is he going to get as many black and latino votes again? Are “fiscal conservatives” going to trust him again? Have 5% of Republican voters been turned off by all the Trumpism? Because our electrons are razor-close. That tiny bit of difference in turnout is everything.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brother, Hillary was a fucking failure.

          Trump will have no slack. Those of us who don’t care are against him now. Carrot over Trump.

  • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know two people that are currently overseeing a genocide and Donald Trump is not one of them… Yet.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He wants to get in, then appoint his sons as leaders after him. His whole family is one giant skid mark.

  • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anybody read the list of indictments just on the federal documents case? It is not going to end well for him, most likely:

    31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act. Each of these charges is for possession of a separate, specific document. Ten of these documents were handed over to the government in June 2022, and the other 21 were recovered in the August 2022 search.[30]

    According to the indictment, the 31 documents describe:

    • U.S. nuclear weapons;
    • foreign military attacks, plans, capabilities, and effects on U.S. interests;
    • foreign nuclear capabilities;
    • foreign support for terrorist activity;
    • communications with foreign leaders;
    • U.S. military activities;
    • White House daily foreign intelligence briefings;
    • potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack;
    • and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.[31]

    He is a traitor through and through, and this is going to make his life painful next year.