• borkcorkedforks@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me it looks like an over estimation of the capabilities for the tech. Same kind of thinking that led to lawyers submitting fake cases as support in court. The current tech can be useful but has to be verified and generally tweaked a bit to be good enough. It certainly has room for improvement in quality and just not lying. Real world use has some copyright questions with what the training data was. Applying it to something creative is questionable and more or less feels like uninspired remixes.

    Also the whole graphic is kinda suspect to me when “Blockchain engineers” is a job category and it’s produced by an org working on AI.

    • Betty White In HD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s fine I’m a “pile driver operator” and my wife is a “tire repairer and changer”, so we’re in “low exposure”.

      Who wrote this shit?

      • bfr0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love how specific the labor jobs on the left are and the right side is like… All mathematicians.

      • tarjeezy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe they already replaced their Writers, Authors, and Proofreaders, and generated the whole thing using ChatGPT.