SkullHex2@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-221 hours agoAAAAlemmy.mlimagemessage-square268fedilinkarrow-up1629arrow-down128
arrow-up1601arrow-down1imageAAAAlemmy.mlSkullHex2@lemmy.ml to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-221 hours agomessage-square268fedilink
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·edit-21 year ago and Ubuntu No. It’s way too complicated to circumvent Canonical’s attempts at vendor lock-in. One might just as well pick a more open distribution from the beginning.
minus-squarecole@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agomost users simply do not care. if it works, it works
minus-squareCmdrShepard@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s a good justification for them to stick with Windows.
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoWhy subject them to snaps if they dont have to be? It’s not that much different between Debian and Ubuntu Debian is WAY more bloat-free than Ubuntu.
No. It’s way too complicated to circumvent Canonical’s attempts at vendor lock-in. One might just as well pick a more open distribution from the beginning.
most users simply do not care. if it works, it works
That’s a good justification for them to stick with Windows.
Why subject them to snaps if they dont have to be? It’s not that much different between Debian and Ubuntu Debian is WAY more bloat-free than Ubuntu.