fornite floss dance for me.

  • Backspacecentury@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lip injections. Not once has looking like you just got hit in the mouth with a hockey puck helped someone look better.

    • mifan@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not that I think it’s a good idea, but to be fair, you’re only noticing the bad and extreme cases. There are subtle and fine cases too that just don’t draws attention to them.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        The thing is, some of the really bad cases still get modeling jobs, which says that someone thinks the bad cases actually look good.

        Even some of the subtler cases look off to me, giving a certain distinctive artificial look. I don’t doubt that if you see it enough it starts to look natural, but to me that just makes it worse.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      The thing is some group of people must like it or people wouldn’t do it.

      Chances are this is a “you aren’t the target audience” type deal.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel like most of them havent seen it in real life though, only on social media. Its just another level of strange seeing it for real

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It can look okay but its a very small group of people who look good with it and a small group of doctors that do it well. They do not consistently pair up.

      Same with buccal fat (cheek fat basically) removal. For most they just look hollowed out, like they did meth for a while. Erin Moriarty (Annie/Starlight on The Boys) is rumored to have had it, and it shows.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    11 months ago

    If we go back in history, there was a point in time, after radioactivity was discovered but before nuclear weapons were developed, where there was a trend of putting radium and other radioactive substances in health and beauty products, because I guess people thought that because it possesed some form of energy that it must be good for you. In hindsight that seems far more stupid than some embarrassing dance or something.

  • Skanky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Man, you guys need to try harder.

    Tide pod challenge

    Saggin pants

    Moustache tattoos on your finger

    Punisher branding for showing how much of a “badass” you are

    Upspeak, Valley girl talk, vocal fry

    Any of these idiotic “pranks” that harm/bother innocent people

    Licking ice cream in the grocery store and putting it back on the shelf (for the clicks of course)

    • Throwaway@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Licking ice cream in the grocery store and putting it back on the shelf (for the clicks of course)

      That one should legit be an actual crime.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      tide pods wasn’t really a thing, sagging is a cultural thing broader than a fad, and you listing a bunch of lame ones while saying others need to “try harder” isn’t quite doing it for me

    • golfrup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree woth most of these but when it comes to upspeak/vocal fry, not at all. People exclusively criticize women for it. I’m pretty sure these criticisms are rooted in misogyny.

      • Skanky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel like upspeak and vocal fry are more prevalent in women (for whatever reason), but i think it’s equally annoying whomever is doing it.

      • qwrty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This talking point doesn’t make sense to me because feminine and masculine voices sound different, so it would make sense that some aspects maybe annoying one a feminine voice and not a masculine voice, and vice versa. Also, I don’t think that some of the source of annoyance comes from the voice itself, but it’s cultural association. The reason why it is so annoying to me is because I associate it with vanity and celebrity worship (probably because of the Kardashians, couldn’t tell you which one as I try to avoid them at all costs).

  • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This stuck with me: Years ago, someone on Reddit described their middle school in the ‘70s having to have an assembly to stop a potlatch/arms race between kids stacking Izod/Lacoste shirts. There were well-off kids wearing three or more stacked Lacoste shirts every day, and poorer kids wearing cheap generic polo shirts under real alligator shirts to try to keep up.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m actually glad I’ve had so much poverty because it’s allowed me to find the things that actually affect my mood in a consistent and reliable way.

        I only was able to find those things because I was forced to manage my mood with almost zero money.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A situation where the poor people are trying to keep up is not a “potlatch”. That would be the rich kids trying to outdo each other to see how many shirts they can give to the poor kids.

      • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I may have an outdated sense of what a potlatch was. I was using the term in the sense of destroying value, per this kind of definition:

        “A potlatch involves giving away or destroying wealth or valuable items in order to demonstrate a leader’s wealth and power. “

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The thumbnail of a person with their mouth wide open used in every YouTube video

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago
        1. One of the crowning moments of performative parenting. I don’t think anyone was killed, but there were arrests and injuries reported.

        The toy was released in July of that year with an initial run of 400,000 units, and sold well. Rosie O’Donnell showed the toy on her show that October, and Black Friday that year they suddenly sold out. Another production run of 600,000 units was started, but the “shopping frenzy” had begun.

        Tickle Me Elmo retailed for just under $30 at the time; scalpers sold them for thousands of dollars apiece, one sold at auction for $18,000. Two women in Chicago were arrested for fighting over one. People chased delivery trucks after the toys, a retail clerk was trampled by a crowd rushing down an aisle to claim theirs, suffering, according to Wikipedia: “a pulled hamstring, injuries to his back, jaw and knee, a broken rib and a concussion”.

        Similar phenomena have occurred before and since; Cabbage Patch Kids, the Playstation 2 and Nintendo Wii saw similar “shopping frenzies” but I don’t think any were quite as loud as Tickle Me Elmo. A toy which I’m sure their children got minutes of mild enjoyment from.

  • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Guys wearing florescent orange or yellow knee high socks with Adidas slides and shorts that was all over a few years ago.

    Dudes setting flat billed hats on top of their head way too high.

    Yeti stickers on trucks. Glad you like your cooler dude.

    Repping brands. Like tshirts that say Oakley or under armor on them. Why are you wearing a shirt that says under armour, but isn’t the actual under armour? You paid them to advertise for them you rube. Seeing Oakley gear kills me, I have very in depth inside knowledge of the optical industry, and Oakley’s aren’t even good glasses. You paid too much for the privilege of looking like a tool.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have very in depth inside knowledge of the optical industry, and Oakley’s aren’t even good glasses.

      Please elaborate, because so do I and not only disagree with you, I have data to prove that Oakley are better. And I don’t even own any, nor care to buy them.

      • sizzler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oakley got killed by luxottica. They killed their market share, bought them out and diluted the quality.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m a licensed advanced optician that owns three practices, I’ve designed and manufactured my own line of frames, I’ve helped design progressive lens forms, I have taught classes at eight out of the last 12 vision expo’s. My capture rate of every premium product sale is miles above the national averages.

        The only brand I call in more warranties in on than Oakley is Nike. Their zyl frames use plastic rivets that regularly snap and can’t be tightened. The temples stretch out over time, which is normal and wouldn’t be an issue except the metals use either single bar spring hinges that will keep loosening or monel flat rivets that can’t be replaced.

        They are not the worst brand by any means, but if you think you’re paying for anything other than the name, you’ve been sold.

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I work in acquisition, and without doxxing myself or violating NDAs, I can see they test their materials to a better standard than Nike or others; their cheap products of course suck by comparison, however their expensive premium lenses are very good compared to other brands. I’m not an Oakley dick rider and own other frames and lenses, just trying to say that there is a lot of hail-corporate/brand loyalty shills here spreading bad info.

    • Triple_B@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like my Oakleys, but they’re regular prescription glasses. Pretty durable and in the (bland) style I prefer.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      tshirts that say

      Many of those are promotional giveaways. I hope most, for the reasons you say.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        No. People are buying them. You think, millions of shirts are produced just as advertisement for - buying shirts of that brand?

    • Tedrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hey, I wear normal Oakley prescription glasses and they’re great. They were the most comfortable frames at the optometrist. Didn’t even know they were Oakley until after I bought them. That being said, I’m not saying you’re wrong.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        When trying on frame initially, Oakley’s actually will be more comfortable due to their temple style, although after your lenses are made any frame will be adjusted and balanced to be exactly as, if not more comfortable with less squeezing. (Unless the place selling the glasses doesn’t care about fitting, which is more common than you’d think)

        • Tedrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Interesting, that’s good input. I had that issue the time before my last visit when I bought new frames. They did not do anything with fitting and just gave me the frames off the shelf. I did not know that wasn’t a common practice until last time. They took time to do a fitting. Still ended up with Oakley though, maybe not next time.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Repping brands. Like tshirts that say Oakley or under armor on them. Why are you wearing a shirt that says under armour, but isn’t the actual under armour? You paid them to advertise for them you rube

      I don’t wear shirts, t-shirts or other clothes with clearly visible logos or brand names, unless I got the piece for free or even am getting paid to wear it.

      Exceptions are music/band gear, if I like the band, and sports gear, because it is so fucking hard to find decent sports gear without visible logos and brand names.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah. Norm core for basics, but I’m generally dressing in layers anyway. I don’t think I’ve worn only a t shirt outside the house in years.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    Someone mentioned the explosion of radium…everything that took place between the discovery of radium and the discovery that radiation is bad for you. Well I’ve got another deadly stupid historic fad: Scheele’s Green.

    Scheele’s Green is a pigment invented in 1775 by Carl Wilhelm Sheele. I’s a vivid slightly yellowish green color, which became all the rage throughout Europe in the early 19th century. It was used in paints, candles, wallpaper, to dye cotton and linen, even to paint children’s toys and as a food dye.

    Scheele’s Green is acidic copper arsenite. CuHASO3. It’s very toxic. Numerous reports exist of children “wasting away” in “bright green rooms,” women “swooning” wearing green dresses, and instances of acute poisoning around burning green candles. The publicity of the 1861 death of a 19 year old named Matilda Scheueur as a result of her job painting artificial plants with the dye, along with her autopsy showing her eyes and fingernails were turning green from the pigment, led to its decline.

    Scheele’s Green was used as an insecticide in the 1930’s.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Keto, it “works” only as a side effect of you ending your intake of something that’s necessary for its balance. You don’t need vigorous exercise to lose weight like some claim but you also shouldn’t take precipitated shortcuts. I bet nobody here has ever had their own doctor tell them “keep up the keto, you’re doing good”.

      • Tedrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a ridiculous diet for someone with no preexisting conditions. There may be medical reasons to go on it. It is not necessary, and can be dangerous, for just anyone to attempt it to lose weight. And don’t get me started on all the keto friendly supplements that are hawked to people.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s certainly not a silver bullet against fat, but it’s also not dangerous. Your body is perfectly capable of producing glucose on its own, as long as there’s enough energy floating around.

          • Tedrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            In the majority of cases it is not dangerous. In rare circumstances it can be dangerous. This is something that should be discussed with a medical professional prior to beginning.

            Any time you are going to have a restrictive diet change it should be discussed with your doctor.

      • the_kid [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        it depends what kind of keto you’re doing - I think there’s like a vegan keto? but for most people, keto seems to mean increasing the amount of animal products you eat which is undeniably awful for your health. a lot of them start eating tons of meat, putting butter in their drinks, eating tons of eggs and end up with obscene cholesterol levels.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any of the ‘fad’ diets. No, carbs aren’t evil. Protien isn’t evil. You didn’t magically lose weight by “not eating carbs”. You lost weight because you cut out an entire food group from your diet - you were eating less. Otherwise just known as dieting. Make it easier on yourself and just limit your calorie intake. That’s pretty much it.

      You can eat pizza and still be dieting. You may be eating 1 slice for an entire meal because it’s just a calorie dump, but you can do it.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I always love it when fad diets make it into non-food related products, and you get Atkins socks or whatever.

        Or better yet when a fad diet happens and foods that never had whatever evil ingredient in the first place add “Now Oxygen Free” or whatever branding. My favorite was the explosion of “suddenly” gluten-free cider.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          And on the flipside, there are those that aren’t actually what they say.

          For example, my local store has “vegan turkey” right now, supposedly a meatless turkey alternative, but it still has quite a bit of animal product in it.

          Goes to show what a difference it makes while also screwing up the market.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The issue I have with keto is that unless you have an absolute will of steel, all that weight instantly comes back once your carb intake ups. If you want to maintain that keto body, you’ll have to be on keto for life.

      Most if us can’t do it for life.

      • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I dropped 60 and only gained back like 20 when I stopped. Taking a handful of pills daily and injecting literal poison weekly now, so I stopped before starting treatment.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It all depends. I don’t have a will of steel, that’s for sure. I started it to lose weight but have continued after my chronic heartburn stopped immediately, my eczema went away, my blood sugar came down and my triglycerides dropped to a normal range. I take 0 prescription meds now.

        I feel so much better, no longer have heartburn wake me up in the middle of the night, and no longer have my fingers crack and bleed from eczema. 7 years in and it’s really no trouble staying on the diet. The 45 lbs I lost turned out to be a minor benefit of the diet, not the major benefit.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I also never had a therapist or psychiatrist tell me about the link between exercise and hippocampal neurogenesis.

      They always explained the benefit of exercise in terms of endorphins.

      What I’m saying is I don’t trust doctors to know what’s up or what’s good for my health.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        What I’m saying is I don’t trust doctors to know what’s up or what’s good for my health.

        That… explains a few things.

        I hope you’re doing okay.