Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a ‘noble’ end?

  • Tamo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me personally, the answer to the original question would be “only once no other non-violent means are available”.

    Does this resonate, or would you consider it different to your perspective? I see them as similar.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally, I’d prefer non-violent over violent means for myself. If other people are involved it would depend - I won’t risk someone else’s life if I can avoid it. I tell my niece that she’s allowed to stab dudes that don’t respond to “no”.