Video related.

There. Is. Not. A. Single. Browser. That. Values. Your. Privacy.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is it just me or is this video stupid af? You can easily disable all of the telemetry in Firefox. Like yea, no shit if you keep recommendations on, it’ll collect data for that. How else would it recomend shit to you? Am i missing something here?

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, Mozilla is non-profit. They run on fumes because of it. As long as everything is disable-able, and it is, I’m happy to let them make some money so they can keep going. We need Firefox.

      It’s infuriating that this video calls out Mozilla’s declaration that they respect user privacy, as if this contradicts that.

      Respect is giving users options to do whatever they like and respecting their choices. Firefox does all of that. It respects you as the user and trusts you to control your own privacy by providing you the tools to do so.

      Modern day software design emphasizes removing user choices so they’re easier to corral. Firefox will straight up let you break it if you want. It lets spinoffs like Fennec exist. That is user respect.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yea. We really do need them. Like no browser is gonna make you 100% (or close to 100%) anonymous unless you use TOR (correctly). Even then idk. TOR is above my knowledge-base so I stick with firefox. It’s really the best you’re gonna get for reasonable privacy control. Of course I hardened it a bit and added a few extensions.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My favourite part is… the context the data is collected. Its collected during you search or interact with firefox addons or Firefox sync.

    • dedale@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Easily? How?
      AFAIK no matter what you do, firefox still calls home sometimes.

      From what I can tell, the idea is to make you feel like, with a little bit of effort, the privacy thing would be achievable,
      but when you actually try, it’s a whole different ordeal.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the settings you can disable telemetry. It’s very self explanatory. Also I think firefox may call home to check if you have telemetry enabled. But that isn’t a big deal. Can you be more specific on what actual data you see Firefox still sending home and exactly what the problem is?

          • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You would have to use wireshark or some other software to look at the actual data being sent. I’m not 100% sure. Likely the first one is just checking to see if you have telemetry enabled or something. Like I said, you can’t just assume all of your data is being sent because it’s phoning Firefox domains. You need to pick apart the traffic. It could literally just be sending (user has telemetry disabled) and that’s it. You don’t know. Firefox is open source. If it was sending massive amounts of user info despite telemetry heing turned off then it would be fucking obvious and you’d hear about it everywhere. You could try posting in a firefox community and asking if anyone knows. I’d be interested too

            • dedale@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly I don’t think I’m technically adept enough to check this myself. I was following firefox privacy guides, and the (much more competent) people writing them were puzzled about those two.
              Of course it’s not necessarily malicious, but it has became hard to be trusting.

              In the end I kind of just gave up on privacy, I take mitigation measures as a symbolic gesture, but still assume someone’s watching over my shoulder whatever I do online. Not a good feeling to be honest.

  • lambda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There. Is. Not. A. Single. Browser. That. Values. Your. Privacy.

    Librewolf, Hardened Firefox, ungoogled-chromium

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first two of which are just Firefox…they’re not browsers in their own right, and they only continue to exist because Mozilla and Firefox continue to exist.

      And Mozilla and Firefox continue to exist because they make money off of the completely optional things that this video is raving about.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Choosing a browser has been picking between terrible choices for a long time now. It’s a shame.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both sides are absolutely not the same, here. Drawing a false comparison between Firefox and Chromium because Firefox has some suggested content is an hysterically ridiculous take.

  • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Important to note there are options.

    I’ve been relatively pleased with the duckduckgo mobile browser. There are a reasonable amount of chromium forks that aim for privacy oriented browsing as well, although I don’t have a specific one to endorse.

    I guess in defense of Mozilla: it isn’t really playing a different game in the browser space, they’re just trying to mitigate some of the toxicity of ad revenue as a foundation. They’re still a non profit hiring from the same pool as the tech industry money printing machine.

    There’s still a limited pool of support they have to pull from, and I like it better with them around so the big 3 don’t have a total monopoly on browser architecture.

    That said it’s maybe the best example the model is flawed at the jump.

    • Bappity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      the DuckDuckGo mobile browser is brilliant, wish it had add-ons like Firefox though. the mobile Firefox browser right now seems to keep becoming more unstable over time :/

      • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’ll get more support with some time. For now it’s a nice browser to keep separate for not polluting what you doing mind putting out in public. I’ve had a lot more smooth experiences with PWAs I load through the ddg browser.

        Actually one area I think it’s got an immediate edge on firefox while the wild wild fediverse sorts out is just how many fewer attack vectors it’s presenting with the pared back features.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    There. Is. Not. A. Single. Browser. That. Values. Your. Privacy.

    Then get off the internet, I guess?

    Mozilla is a non profit, which puts them leagues ahead of all competition in terms of trustworthiness. They have minor telemetry and sponsored things that can all be disabled, and that’s entirely because they need to make some money somehow. No one donates, so what do you expect them to do?

    They respect your privacy by giving you the option to disable everything. That is far more respect than you will ever get from any of the chromium browsers.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mhm… bold statement from a YouTuber that uses YouTube, Google and fricking Windows 11.

    • Vexz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He talks about Mozilla’s official terms of their user’s privacy. Doesn’t matter what OS, search engine and video platform he uses.

  • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All of these are about sponsored content. AFAIK in the current model of sponsored content have to inlude some tracking as they need to keep track of how many click goea through, acvording to that they will charge their client.

    I kind of wish there would be non-tracking based ads, like burned in mid-roll ads on youtube: Just give a shout out and collect money. But it is pertty hard to convince others to switch to that model without solid data.

    Finally, everything they mentioned are sponsored content and pocket, both can be turned off with one click. I call that a win in the distopian modern internet. And obviously there are more privacy oriented fork that strips these tracking content by default.

  • Vexz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I knew that before but there’s something you can do about it. At least I hope it helps.

    In about:config find and set the following options:
    extensions.pocket.enabled = false
    toolkit.coverage.endpoint.base = "" (empty string)
    toolkit.coverage.opt-out = true
    toolkit.telemetry.coverage.opt-out = true
    browser.region.update.enabled = false
    browser.region.network.url = "" (empty string)

    Block the following domains in Pi-hole, AGH, NextDNS or of you don’t use any of that then in you hosts file:
    spocs.getpocket.com
    location.services.mozilla.com
    contile.services.mozilla.com
    getpocket.cdn.mozilla.net