Really starting to miss when you were banned from more things. Like this is a super long reach into irrelevance even for you.
It’s a political candidate who is still in the race. How is this a reach? Did you watch the interview?
I didn’t, and won’t, because she’s just as irrelevant now as she was in the last election.
Orb Mom makes some good points. It’s an interview on ABC News.
Dude, self help book lady from the 90s who has never held any office, never done anything remotely useful politically, and has literally dropped out of this race twice already has nothing useful to contribute.
Oh wait. That’s why she speaks to you, isn’t it. That sense of “making your voice heard” even though neither of you has anything useful to say.
She’s a registered Democrat. Does her voice not matter?
From the interview:
“I think the Democratic leadership completely underestimates the level of disgust that Americans are feeling due to their cowardice, due to their hypocrisy. You know, the issue is not just crisis; it’s crisis management. And they are failing at crisis management,” Williamson told Phillips.
“If [Biden] doesn’t want to give up the delegates, he doesn’t have to. It’s called an intervention. It’s called Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Schumer and whomever else walking into a room with the president, with the First Lady, with Hunter – whomever – and saying, this has got to stop. You are risking our victory in November,” Williamson said.
Where is she wrong?
In the sense of determining election results, her voice does not statistically matter. No one with half a brain takes her seriously enough to listen to anything she says.
She’s wrong in thinking (and I use the term generously) that Jeffries, Schumer, or “whomever” can have an intervention with the POTUS like he’s an addict on a bender. She’d probably know how ridiculous that sounds if she’d ever, you know, done anything useful politically.
If Biden is not replaced, Trump will win. Period. You know I’ve been saying it for months now.
