• sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless I’m missing something, I’m guessing a lot of the not-using-turn-signal idiots are also distracted on their phone. There must be significant overlap on that Venn diagram.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also overlapped with the people who think that if you miss your exit, the correct response is to swerve across four lanes of traffic and across road markings, so that you don’t have to just go one stop further and turn around.

  • anon6789@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel the lack of signal use is thinking you’ll be doing something quickly and you don’t see anyone where you’ll be turning. That’s also exactly why we need to be signing though.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. This is why I don’t bother washing my hands when there’s nobody else in the bathroom.

  • Tehgingey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The smart turn signal is a good idea, when I first read it I thought it would be an automatic thing based on where the vehicle wheels are positioned but it looks to just be an audible and visual reminder. That’s still cool, I think annoying people has proven a pretty good way to get them to do something.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love when people just repeatedly say the same infeasible solutions over and over again

      Definitely helps out the cause and doesn’t make people bitter towards the idea

      Unless that’s what you’re going for ig

      • coolin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ban cars is a lot like saying defund the police

        It makes a whole lot of sense when you stop and examine the reasoning, but it masks the wide reaching social and infrastructure reforms needed to accomplish it with a short meme that people misinterpret.

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly my point - it’s catchy and edgy sure but it’s probably not going to be sufficient and I’m gonna argue it’ll only give fuel to the opposition

      • Moyer1666@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not wrong. I should say more than that. Cars are a systemic issue that has seeped it’s way into every aspect of society here in the US. Everything is really far apart and outside of major cities there is no public transit that is quick and reliable so the only way to get around is to drive. Now everyone needs to buy and maintain a large vehicle. It’s expensive and takes up a lot of space in an extremely inefficient way. So inefficient that no highway could ever dream of transporting as many passengers as a single bus or train. The expense disproportionately effects poor people as the cost of a car doesn’t go down and just takes up a higher percentage of your income. Essentially being the reason you can’t ever save money and simultaneously the only thing bringing money in.

        Don’t forget about the climate effect it causes, and electric cars only sort of help.