• Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    171·
    10 months ago

    I really don’t like how “consumer-friendly” means “GUI that resembles Windows” in the minds of so many people.

    • monkeyman512@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Gotta meet the customer where they are, not where you would like them to be. Most people don’t want to learn a new thing.

      • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
        0·
        10 months ago

        You gotta meet the customer halfway until you get enough of them hooked, then slowly start introducing new ideas into their mental ecosystems that align with your vision.

    • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
      1·
      10 months ago

      I like the terminal but don’t remember all the arguments. I find that clunky. That’s my main issue with it. (I’m open to suggestions if anyone has any)

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        0·
        10 months ago

        I highly recommend zsh. It takes a moment to setup initially, but you can use oh-my-zsh to just skip that part and use one of the many, many presets, and it supports plugins, of which there are many. It gives you tab support for so many popular commands, you will never need to remember them, and it has a lot of small improvements that makes your terminal life a breath. For example, if you do cd tab in bash, it will give you a list of subdirrectories. If you do the same in zsh, it will give you that list and a cursor that you can use to navigate said list, so instead of typing the dir, you can do cd tab tab tab enter

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            1·
            10 months ago

            I have very little experience with fish, but by my first experience zsh was way better at handling wildcard matching, and for me it’s half of the stuff I do. You are trying to open a file and all you remember is that it has some substring in the name probably, you just type some of it, double tab, and you have all the files that match. At the time I was trying it, fish couldn’t do it.

  • LovePoson@lemmy.world
    2·
    10 months ago

    Linux is just as user friendly. It’s just that you can’t compare the experience you already have on something completely different

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    2·
    10 months ago

    The purpose of Unix was to be user friendly. And it is. You haven’t seen what it replaced.

    Also friendliness doesn’t require a Fisher Price interface.

  • Ooops@kbin.social
    21·
    10 months ago

    That’s defintiely the wrong title.

    No, it’s not the user catching Linux in trying to pretend user friendliness witht the terminal.

    It’s Linux catching the user in still hating it when he gets the wanted user friendliness, for the sole reason of being conditioned to hate the terminal.