• Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I have never been in a starbucks so I cannot actually boycott them, I will however continue to not go there.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow. Moving someone to another location and then suddenly firing them for “communication standards?” Unless there’s some highly compelling evidence to indicate otherwise, it’s pretty clear cut what happened here. I guess they calculate it’s better to pay a fine for a wrongful dismissal than to have a supervisor that is sympathetic to workers.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      As a society, we should ensure everyone that goes through something like this ends up a millionaire who never has to work again.

      That’ll motivate workers to unionize more than anything else we could possibly do.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Want to fix this? It’ll take a) jail time, and b) asset seizure.

        Corporate structure deliberate distributes responsibility for things like this such that:

        • It’s very hard to find one person to blame, let alone prove malfeasance.
        • If by some chance you do find a smoking gun, the fine for doing so is usually less than the profit of the transgression

        If, eg, Howard Schultz and his direct-reports faced fines and/or jail time directly, and those fines were orders of magnitude the harms of the action, then you’d see some of this stop.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      In this region of Canada, at least, the maximum penalty for wrongful dismissal is … Standard severance.

      Source: a dear friend launched a successful human-rights complaint against a very deep-pocketed employer who blatantly violated clear medical orders and then fired him when he objected. Like, 100% dead-to-rights on a claim with no normal upper limit. Except here it maxes out at a pittance.

      Maybe there too.

  • uzi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let each person rise and fall according the merits of their work and quality of their duties. No person is entitled to anything. Even respect has to be earned and prove why anyone should treat someone with dignity and honour.

    • jadero@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Let each person business rise and fall according the merits of their work and quality of their duties. No person business is entitled to anything. Even respect has to be earned.